Ollama: Ollama: improve existing draft article

2026-10-20T12:04:07Z

Ollama: improve existing draft article

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 20 October 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			The [[Human sex ratio]] refers to the proportion of males to females in a given population, a topic with significant implications for evolutionary biology, reproductive health, and societal structures. While the ratio is often cited as approaching 1:1 at birth, variations occur across species, populations, and life stages, influenced by biological, environmental, and cultural factors.
⚫	https://psyarxiv.com/sb8w6/

			{{H2\|Evolutionary and Biological Foundations}}
⚫	https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29521023/
			The classical explanation for the near-equal sex ratio at birth in humans and many other species is rooted in evolutionary theory. As noted in evolutionary biology literature, a 1:1 ratio maximizes genetic diversity by ensuring equal investment in male and female offspring. This balance is thought to optimize reproductive success, as both sexes are necessary for continuation of the species. However, exceptions exist, such as in species where one sex requires greater parental investment, leading to skewed ratios favoring the more "valuable" sex under certain conditions.

			{{H2\|Biological Mechanisms and Variations}}
⚫	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio
			At the biological level, the [[Human sex ratio]] at conception is slightly skewed toward males, with approximately 105 males born for every 100 females. This discrepancy, though small, may be influenced by factors such as maternal age, environmental stressors, and hormonal conditions during pregnancy. Some studies suggest that male embryos may be more vulnerable to miscarriage, which could explain why the ratio at birth appears closer to 1:1. [[https://psyarxiv.com/sb8w6/]]

			{{H2\|Societal and Cultural Influences}}
	The classic response is that nature has settled on close to a 1:1 sex ratio (in general) because it maximises genetic diversity.
			Human societies have historically influenced sex ratios through practices such as sex-selective abortion, infanticide, and differential treatment of male and female children. These factors have led to significant deviations from the natural 1:1 ratio in certain regions. For example, in some countries with strong cultural preferences for male offspring, the sex ratio at birth has been reported to be as high as 120 males per 100 females. Such imbalances raise concerns about long-term demographic and social consequences, including labor shortages and gender inequality. [[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29521023/]]

			{{H2\|Statistical and Longitudinal Trends}}
	Value of men.
			Longitudinal studies have shown that the [[Human sex ratio]] can shift over time due to changing societal norms, healthcare advancements, and economic factors. For instance, improvements in maternal healthcare have been linked to a slight increase in female survival rates, potentially altering population-level ratios. Additionally, the "value of women past menopause" has been a subject of debate in evolutionary and sociological contexts, as post-reproductive females may contribute to group survival through caregiving or other social roles. [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio]]

			{{H2\|Conclusion}}
	Value of women past menopause.
			The [[Human sex ratio]] remains a complex interplay of biological imperatives and human agency. While evolutionary mechanisms generally favor a near-equal ratio, human societies have demonstrated the capacity to disrupt these patterns through cultural and technological interventions. Understanding these dynamics is critical for addressing demographic challenges and promoting gender equity globally.

			== References ==
	{{Draft}}
		⚫	* [[https://psyarxiv.com/sb8w6/]]
		⚫	* [[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29521023/]]
		⚫	* [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio]]

			{{Ollama}}
			{{Pending Human Review}}

Robert Brockway at 04:49, 10 July 2025

2025-07-10T04:49:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 10 July 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio		https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio

			The classic response is that nature has settled on close to a 1:1 sex ratio (in general) because it maximises genetic diversity.

			Value of men.

			Value of women past menopause.

	{{Draft}}		{{Draft}}

Robert Brockway: Robert Brockway moved page Sex ratio to Human sex ratio

2025-07-10T04:34:26Z

Robert Brockway moved page Sex ratio to Human sex ratio

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:34, 10 July 2025
(No difference)

Robert Brockway at 23:49, 23 January 2025

2025-01-23T23:49:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 23 January 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:

	https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29521023/		https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29521023/

			https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio

			{{Draft}}

Robert Brockway at 02:55, 31 December 2022

2022-12-31T02:55:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:55, 31 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	https://psyarxiv.com/sb8w6/		https://psyarxiv.com/sb8w6/

			https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29521023/

Robert Brockway: Created page with "https://psyarxiv.com/sb8w6/"

2020-09-08T00:56:26Z

Created page with "https://psyarxiv.com/sb8w6/"

New page