Feminist uncertainly principle - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 16:45, 10 October 2021

2021-10-10T16:45:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 10 October 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).		The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).

	In recent years the tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take concrete positions. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the flaws within feminist ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists, [[Mona Eltahawy]], stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>		In recent years the tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take concrete positions. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the flaws within feminist ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists, including [[Mona Eltahawy]], stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>

	== References ==		== References ==

Robert Brockway at 16:44, 10 October 2021

2021-10-10T16:44:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 10 October 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).		The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).

	In recent years the tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take concrete positions. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the flaws within feminist ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>		In recent years the tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take concrete positions. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the flaws within feminist ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists, [[Mona Eltahawy]], stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>

	== References ==		== References ==

Robert Brockway at 13:01, 8 February 2021

2021-02-08T13:01:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 8 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).		The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).

	In recent years the tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take concrete positions. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the ~~floors~~ within ~~feminists~~ ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>		In recent years the tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take concrete positions. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the flaws within feminist ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>

	== References ==		== References ==

Robert Brockway at 13:00, 8 February 2021

2021-02-08T13:00:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 8 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).		The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).

	In recent years the tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete ~~position~~. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>		In recent years the tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take concrete positions. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>

	== References ==		== References ==

Robert Brockway at 13:00, 8 February 2021

2021-02-08T13:00:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 8 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).		The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).

	In recent years ~~this~~ tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>		In recent years the tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>

	== References ==		== References ==

Robert Brockway at 13:00, 8 February 2021

2021-02-08T13:00:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 8 February 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:

	In recent years this tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>		In recent years this tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>

			== References ==

	[[Category: Featured Articles]]		[[Category: Featured Articles]]

Robert Brockway at 12:59, 8 February 2021

2021-02-08T12:59:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:59, 8 February 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	In recent years this tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>		In recent years this tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>

	[[Category:Featured Articles]]		[[Category: Featured Articles]]
			[[Category: Feminism]]
			[[Category: Glossary]]

Robert Brockway at 14:54, 19 November 2019

2019-11-19T14:54:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 19 November 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).		The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).

	In recent years this tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show Q&A in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.		In recent years this tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show [[Q&A]] in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/05/lets-burn-stuff-qa-panellists-debate-violence-and-shattering-the-status-quo</ref>

	[[Category:Featured Articles]]		[[Category:Featured Articles]]

Robert Brockway at 14:53, 19 November 2019

2019-11-19T14:53:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 19 November 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).		The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).

	In recent years this tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as the		In recent years this tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as demonstrating the floors within feminists ideology is then as simple as pointing to the words of leading feminists. A recent example of this was an episode of the Australian talk show Q&A in which prominent feminists stated that the police should be abolished and that women should be violent towards men.

	[[Category:~~Draft~~ Articles]]		[[Category:Featured Articles]]

Robert Brockway: Created page with "The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsist..."

2019-11-19T14:51:28Z

Created page with "The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsist..."

New page

The feminist uncertainty principle refers to the tendency for feminists to be evasive on their position on key issues. This comes naturally from the many internally inconsistent and contradictory ideas within feminism. Eg, Feminists have often advocated violence while simultaneously maintaining feminism as an ideology of peace (and often placing the blame for all violence at the feet of men).

In recent years this tendency for feminists to be evasive has declined and leading feminists are now more inclined to take a concrete position. This has made the work of anti-feminists easier as the

[[Category:Draft Articles]]