Ollama: Ollama: improve existing draft article

2026-10-15T09:55:37Z

Ollama: improve existing draft article

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:55, 15 October 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
		⚫	[[File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png\|400px]]

			The [[Equal Rights Amendment]] (ERA) is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution aimed at guaranteeing equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. First introduced in 1923, the ERA seeks to eliminate gender-based discrimination by ensuring that constitutional rights apply equally to men and women. Despite widespread support from various civil rights groups and lawmakers over the decades, the amendment has not yet been fully ratified and remains a subject of ongoing political and legal debate.

			{{H2\|History}}
⚫	[[File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png\|400px]]
			The [[Equal Rights Amendment]] was first proposed in 1923 by suffragist Alice Paul, who sought to address gender inequality in the legal system. The amendment was introduced in Congress multiple times, gaining momentum during the second wave of feminism in the 1960s and 1970s. In 1972, Congress passed the ERA with a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, setting a deadline of 1979 for the necessary 38 states to ratify it. However, the deadline was later extended to 1982 due to political pressure and advocacy from supporters.

			{{H2\|Current Status}}
⚫	https://daily.jstor.org/why-the-equal-rights-amendment-hasnt-been-ratified-yet/
			As of 2023, the [[Equal Rights Amendment]] has been ratified by 38 states, meeting the constitutional threshold for adoption. However, the amendment has not been formally added to the Constitution due to disputes over the validity of ratifications after the original 1982 deadline. Critics argue that some states' ratifications were invalid because they occurred after the deadline, while proponents contend that the deadline was not constitutionally binding and that the amendment should be recognized as valid. The debate continues, with recent legislative efforts in several states seeking to revive the ERA's ratification process.

			{{H2\|Legal and Political Implications}}
			The [[Equal Rights Amendment]] has sparked significant legal and political discourse. Supporters argue that it would provide a stronger legal foundation for combating gender discrimination in areas such as employment, education, and healthcare. Opponents, however, have raised concerns about potential unintended consequences, including the impact on existing laws and the role of the federal government in regulating gender-related issues. Legal scholars and activists continue to analyze the amendment's potential implications for constitutional law and civil rights protections.

			{{H2\|References}}
		⚫	* [https://daily.jstor.org/why-the-equal-rights-amendment-hasnt-been-ratified-yet/ JSTOR]

	{{Draft}}
	{{Law}}		{{Law}}

			{{Ollama}}
			{{Pending Human Review}}

Robert Brockway at 14:02, 29 July 2023

2023-07-29T14:02:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 29 July 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png\|400px]]		[[File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png\|400px]]

			https://daily.jstor.org/why-the-equal-rights-amendment-hasnt-been-ratified-yet/

			{{Draft}}
			{{Law}}

Robert Brockway at 22:40, 28 April 2023

2023-04-28T22:40:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 28 April 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:


	[[File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png]]		[[File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png\|400px]]

Robert Brockway: Created page with " File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png"

2023-04-28T22:40:26Z

Created page with " File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png"

New page

[[File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png]]

Equal Rights Amendment - Revision history

Ollama: Ollama: improve existing draft article

Robert Brockway at 14:02, 29 July 2023

Robert Brockway at 22:40, 28 April 2023

Robert Brockway: Created page with " File:Fu0uQFgWIAUelZR.png"