Cervical cancer - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 07:41, 9 April 2023

2023-04-09T07:41:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:41, 9 April 2023
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[Category: Featured Articles]]		[[Category: Featured Articles]]
	[[Category: Genital Mutilation]]		[[Category: Genital Mutilation]]
			[[Category: Women]]

Robert Brockway at 07:41, 9 April 2023

2023-04-09T07:41:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:41, 9 April 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Some researchers have claimed that [[cervical cancer]] is less likely in women that have not had sex with intact men.

	Proponents of circumcision, particularly in the West assert that intact men spread Human Papillomavirus (HPV). This claim is predicated on the notion that infant boys should undergo unnecessary surgery for the benefit of future female sexual partners. This is a clear example of [[gynocentrism]] as men are expected to endure genital mutilation for the benefit of women. Further, research suggests that circumcision offers no protective advantage against HPV anyway.		Proponents of circumcision, particularly in the West assert that intact men spread Human Papillomavirus (HPV). This claim is predicated on the notion that infant boys should undergo unnecessary surgery for the benefit of future female sexual partners. This is a clear example of [[gynocentrism]] as men are expected to endure genital mutilation for the benefit of women. Further, research suggests that circumcision offers no protective advantage against HPV anyway.

Robert Brockway at 07:46, 28 February 2021

2021-02-28T07:46:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:46, 28 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Proponents of circumcision, particularly in the West assert that intact men spread Human Papillomavirus (HPV). This claim is ~~steeped~~ in ~~[[gynocentrism]]~~ ~~as it presumes~~ that infant boys should undergo unnecessary surgery ~~without their consent~~ for the benefit of future female sexual partners.		Proponents of circumcision, particularly in the West assert that intact men spread Human Papillomavirus (HPV). This claim is predicated on the notion that infant boys should undergo unnecessary surgery for the benefit of future female sexual partners. This is a clear example of [[gynocentrism]] as men are expected to endure genital mutilation for the benefit of women. Further, research suggests that circumcision offers no protective advantage against HPV anyway.


	A 2003 article in The Israeli Medical Association Journal noted:		A 2003 article in The Israeli Medical Association Journal noted:
Line 15:		Line 14:
	== References ==		== References ==

	[[Category: ~~Draft~~ Articles]]		[[Category: Featured Articles]]
			[[Category: Genital Mutilation]]

Robert Brockway at 07:44, 28 February 2021

2021-02-28T07:44:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:44, 28 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Proponents of circumcision, particularly in the West assert that intact men spread Human Papillomavirus (HPV). This claim is steeped in [[gynocentrism]] as it presumes that infant boys should undergo unnecessary surgery without their consent for the benefit of future female sexual partners.


	A 2003 article in The Israeli Medical Association Journal noted:		A 2003 article in The Israeli Medical Association Journal noted:

Robert Brockway at 07:25, 28 February 2021

2021-02-28T07:25:11Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 cervical cancer in various populations is still ongoing [23,24], there
 seems to be no hard evidence that circumcision prevents its
 occurrence in Jewish women, and it is no longer considered to play
-a protective role.<ref>https://www.ima.org.il/FilesUploadPublic/IMAJ/0/53/26816.pdf</ref></blockquote>
+<ref>https://www.ima.org.il/FilesUploadPublic/IMAJ/0/53/26816.pdf</ref>

Robert Brockway: Created page with "
Although the dispute over the association of circumcision and cervical cancer in various populations is still ongoing [23,24], there seems to be no hard evidence t..."

2021-02-28T07:24:20Z

Created page with "<blockquote>Although the dispute over the association of circumcision and cervical cancer in various populations is still ongoing [23,24], there seems to be no hard evidence t..."

New page

<blockquote>Although the dispute over the association of circumcision and
cervical cancer in various populations is still ongoing [23,24], there
seems to be no hard evidence that circumcision prevents its
occurrence in Jewish women, and it is no longer considered to play
a protective role.<ref>https://www.ima.org.il/FilesUploadPublic/IMAJ/0/53/26816.pdf</ref></blockquote>

Cervical cancer - Revision history

Robert Brockway at 07:41, 9 April 2023

Robert Brockway at 07:41, 9 April 2023

Robert Brockway at 07:46, 28 February 2021

Robert Brockway at 07:44, 28 February 2021

Robert Brockway at 07:25, 28 February 2021

Robert Brockway: Created page with "Although the dispute over the association of circumcision and cervical cancer in various populations is still ongoing [23,24], there seems to be no hard evidence t..."

Robert Brockway: Created page with "
Although the dispute over the association of circumcision and cervical cancer in various populations is still ongoing [23,24], there seems to be no hard evidence t..."