Wiki 4 Men - User contributions [en]

Hanna Rosin

2026-10-13T19:03:22Z

V for Vernon:

[[Hanna Rosin]] is an American journalist, author, and podcaster, commonly speaking on politics, [[feminism]], and gender themes.

{{H2|Early Life}}
[[Hanna Rosin]] was born in the Israel in 1969 to Jewish parents. In 1974, her family immigrated to the United States and settled in Queens, New York, where she was raised.<ref>https://www.ted.com/speakers/hanna_rosin</ref>

{{H2|The End of Men}}
[[Hanna Rosin]]'s 2010 *Atlantic* article "The End of Men" and her [[The End of Men (book)|2012 book of the same name]] contained assertions including but not limited to: the post-industrial economy favoring women, education favoring girls over boys, and parents preferring girls. <ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/</ref><ref>https://www.npr.org/2012/08/27/160130959/excerpt-the-end-of-men-and-the-rise-of-women</ref>

In an interview with Financial Times in 2012, she has alleged that she is not celebrating the "end of men":

<blockquote>“I am not celebrating the end of men,” Rosin says. “It’s not wholly good for men or women. For college-educated women it’s bad right now because there is no give in the system so they do everything. They take on new roles, without shedding old ones. They have new responsibilities in the public sphere but they haven’t surrendered control of the domestic sphere, which has created an impossible set of pressures.”</blockquote> <ref>https://www.ft.com/content/e3e2482a-0cea-11e2-a73c-00144feabdc0</ref>

[[Hanna Rosin]] has participated in a [[Men are Obsolete (Munk debate)|Munk Debate]] in 2013 also featuring Caitlin Moran, [[Camille Paglia]], and Maureen Dowd. <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VefECwF7AHk</ref>

{{H2|See Also}}
* [[Rosinism]]

{{Bio}}
{{IL}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Hanna Rosin

2026-10-13T19:02:21Z

V for Vernon:

[[Hanna Rosin]] is an American journalist, author, and podcaster, commonly speaking on politics, [[feminism]], and gender themes.

{{H2|Early Life}}
[[Hanna Rosin]] was born in the Israel in 1969 to Jewish parents. In 1974, her family immigrated to the United States and settled in Queens, New York, where she was raised.<ref>https://www.ted.com/speakers/hanna_rosin</ref>

{{H2|The End of Men}}
[[Hanna Rosin]]'s 2010 *Atlantic* article "The End of Men" and her [[The End of Men (book)|2012 book of the same name]] contained assertions including but not limited to: the post-industrial economy favoring women, education favoring girls over boys, and parents preferring girls. <ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/</ref><ref>https://www.npr.org/2012/08/27/160130959/excerpt-the-end-of-men-and-the-rise-of-women</ref>

In an interview with Financial Times in 2012, she has stated that she is not celebrating the "end of men":

<blockquote>“I am not celebrating the end of men,” Rosin says. “It’s not wholly good for men or women. For college-educated women it’s bad right now because there is no give in the system so they do everything. They take on new roles, without shedding old ones. They have new responsibilities in the public sphere but they haven’t surrendered control of the domestic sphere, which has created an impossible set of pressures.”</blockquote> <ref>https://www.ft.com/content/e3e2482a-0cea-11e2-a73c-00144feabdc0</ref>

[[Hanna Rosin]] has participated in a [[Men are Obsolete (Munk debate)|Munk Debate]] in 2013 also featuring Caitlin Moran, [[Camille Paglia]], and Maureen Dowd. <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VefECwF7AHk</ref>

{{H2|See Also}}
* [[Rosinism]]

{{Bio}}
{{IL}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Hanna Rosin

2026-10-13T19:02:07Z

V for Vernon:

[[Hanna Rosin]] is an American journalist, author, and podcaster, commonly speaking on politics, [[feminism]], and gender themes.

{{H2|Early Life}}
[[Hanna Rosin]] was born in the Israel in 1969 to Jewish parents. In 1974, her family immigrated to the United States and settled in Queens, New York, where she was raised.<ref>https://www.ted.com/speakers/hanna_rosin</ref>

{{H2|The End of Men}}
[[Hanna Rosin]]'s 2010 *Atlantic* article "The End of Men" and her [[The End of Men (book)|2012 book of the same name]] contained assertions including but not limited to: the post-industrial economy favoring women, education favoring girls over boys, and parents preferring girls. <ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/</ref><ref>https://www.npr.org/2012/08/27/160130959/excerpt-the-end-of-men-and-the-rise-of-women</ref>

In an interview with Financial Times in 2012, she has stated that she is not celebrating the "end of men":

<blockquote>“I am not celebrating the end of men,” Rosin says. “It’s not wholly good for men or women. For college-educated women it’s bad right now because there is no give in the system so they do everything. They take on new roles, without shedding old ones. They have new responsibilities in the public sphere but they haven’t surrendered control of the domestic sphere, which has created an impossible set of pressures.”</blockquote> <ref>https://www.ft.com/content/e3e2482a-0cea-11e2-a73c-00144feabdc0</ref>

[[Hanna Rosin]] has participated in a [[Men are Obsolete (Munk debate)Munk Debate]] in 2013 also featuring Caitlin Moran, [[Camille Paglia]], and Maureen Dowd. <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VefECwF7AHk</ref>

{{H2|See Also}}
* [[Rosinism]]

{{Bio}}
{{IL}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Hanna Rosin

2026-10-13T18:59:42Z

V for Vernon:

[[Hanna Rosin]] is an American journalist, author, and podcaster, commonly speaking on politics, [[feminism]], and gender themes.

{{H2|Early Life}}
[[Hanna Rosin]] was born in the Israel in 1969 to Jewish parents. In 1974, her family immigrated to the United States and settled in Queens, New York, where she was raised.<ref>https://www.ted.com/speakers/hanna_rosin</ref>

{{H2|The End of Men}}
[[Hanna Rosin]]'s 2010 *Atlantic* article "The End of Men" and her 2012 book of the same name contained assertions including but not limited to: the post-industrial economy favoring women, education favoring girls over boys, and parents preferring girls. <ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/</ref><ref>https://www.npr.org/2012/08/27/160130959/excerpt-the-end-of-men-and-the-rise-of-women</ref>

In an interview with Financial Times in 2012, she has stated that she is not celebrating the "end of men":

<blockquote>“I am not celebrating the end of men,” Rosin says. “It’s not wholly good for men or women. For college-educated women it’s bad right now because there is no give in the system so they do everything. They take on new roles, without shedding old ones. They have new responsibilities in the public sphere but they haven’t surrendered control of the domestic sphere, which has created an impossible set of pressures.”</blockquote> <ref>https://www.ft.com/content/e3e2482a-0cea-11e2-a73c-00144feabdc0</ref>

[[Hanna Rosin]] has participated in a Munk Debate in 2013 also featuring Caitlin Moran, [[Camille Paglia]], and Maureen Dowd. <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VefECwF7AHk</ref>

{{H2|See Also}}
* [[Rosinism]]

{{Bio}}
{{IL}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Hanna Rosin

2026-10-13T18:59:02Z

V for Vernon:

[[Hanna Rosin]] is an American journalist, author, and podcaster, commonly speaking on politics, [[feminism]], and gender themes.

{{H2|Early Life and Education}}
[[Hanna Rosin]] was born in the Israel in 1969 to Jewish parents. In 1974, her family immigrated to the United States and settled in Queens, New York, where she was raised.<ref>https://www.ted.com/speakers/hanna_rosin</ref>

{{H2|The End of Men}}
[[Hanna Rosin]]'s 2010 *Atlantic* article "The End of Men" and her 2012 book of the same name contained assertions including but not limited to: the post-industrial economy favoring women, education favoring girls over boys, and parents preferring girls. <ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/</ref><ref>https://www.npr.org/2012/08/27/160130959/excerpt-the-end-of-men-and-the-rise-of-women</ref>

In an interview with Financial Times in 2012, she has stated that she is not celebrating the "end of men":

<blockquote>“I am not celebrating the end of men,” Rosin says. “It’s not wholly good for men or women. For college-educated women it’s bad right now because there is no give in the system so they do everything. They take on new roles, without shedding old ones. They have new responsibilities in the public sphere but they haven’t surrendered control of the domestic sphere, which has created an impossible set of pressures.”</blockquote> <ref>https://www.ft.com/content/e3e2482a-0cea-11e2-a73c-00144feabdc0</ref>

[[Hanna Rosin]] has participated in a Munk Debate in 2013 also featuring Caitlin Moran, [[Camille Paglia]], and Maureen Dowd. <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VefECwF7AHk</ref>

{{H2|See Also}}
* [[Rosinism]]

{{Bio}}
{{IL}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Hanna Rosin

2026-10-13T18:58:47Z

V for Vernon:

[[Hanna Rosin]] is an American journalist, author, and podcaster, commonly speaking on politics, [[feminism]], and gender themes.

{{H2|Early Life and Education}}
[[Hanna Rosin]] was born in the Israel in 1969 to Jewish parents. In 1974, her family immigrated to the United States and settled in Queens, New York, where she was raised.<ref>https://www.ted.com/speakers/hanna_rosin</ref>

{{H2|The End of Men}}
[[Hanna Rosin]]'s 2010 *Atlantic* article "The End of Men" and her 2012 book of the same name contained assertions including but not limited to: the post-industrial economy favoring women, education favoring girls over boys, and parents preferring girls. <ref>https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/</ref><ref>https://www.npr.org/2012/08/27/160130959/excerpt-the-end-of-men-and-the-rise-of-women</ref>

In an interview with Financial Times in 2012, she has stated that she is not celebrating the "end of men":

<blockquote>“I am not celebrating the end of men,” Rosin says. “It’s not wholly good for men or women. For college-educated women it’s bad right now because there is no give in the system so they do everything. They take on new roles, without shedding old ones. They have new responsibilities in the public sphere but they haven’t surrendered control of the domestic sphere, which has created an impossible set of pressures.”</blockquote> <ref>https://www.ft.com/content/e3e2482a-0cea-11e2-a73c-00144feabdc0</ref>

[[Hannah Rosin]] has participated in a Munk Debate in 2013 also featuring Caitlin Moran, [[Camille Paglia]], and Maureen Dowd. <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VefECwF7AHk</ref>

{{H2|See Also}}
* [[Rosinism]]

{{Bio}}
{{IL}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart

2026-10-08T02:11:20Z

V for Vernon:

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart, professionally known as [[Pink]] (often spelled/stylized as P!nk) is an American singer and songwriter.

{{H2|Controversies and Public Statements}}
In 2019, [[Pink]] reacted to celebrities announcing that they did not perform [[Male genital mutilation|routine infant circumcision]] on their sons, responding by posting a half-naked photograph of her toddler son on Instagram with the circumcision wound visible. Amid backlash after the story going viral, [[Pink]] claimed that she did not realize her son was half-naked the photograph, deleted the original photo, and referred to her critics as "f**ing disgusting trolls".

In 2023, she faced backlash after ejecting a concertgoer who was protesting male circumcision during a performance in San Antonio at the Alamodome in September 25th, 2023, in a clear response to the 2019 viral occurrence. During the incident, which occurred mid-show, [[Pink]] called the concertgoer "that cancer", and later defended her actions, claiming that the protest was "disruptive" and "not appropriate" for the event.

In another notable instance, [[Pink]] expressed strong opposition to the overturning of *Roe v. Wade* in 2022. She publicly urged fans who opposed the decision to "NEVER f***ing listen to my music again,". This statement, which appeared on her social media accounts, drew both support and criticism from her audience.

[[Pink]] made several Instagram posts mocking Charlie Kirk's funeral and accusing Kirk of being a white supremacist. Amid backlash, she had deleted the posts.

{{H2|References}}
- [[usatoday.com]]: [[[Pink]] faces backlash over posting photo of circumcised son without diaper](https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/allthemoms/2019/04/01/[[pink]]-slams-trolls-after-posting-photo-son-without-diaper/3331926002/)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] kicks out concertgoer protesting circumcision mid-show](https://people.com/[[Pink]]-kicks-out-concertgoer-protesting-circumcision-mid-show-7974853)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] tells fans who oppose Roe v. Wade to "never listen to my music"](https://people.com/music/[[Pink]]-tells-fans-who-oppose-roe-v-wade-to-never-listen-to-my-music/)
- [[youtube.com]]: [[[Pink]] deletes Instagram posts mocking Charlie Kirk's death](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7dGCF3sR2s)

{{Bio}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart

2026-10-08T02:10:35Z

V for Vernon:

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart, professionally known as [[Pink]] (often spelled/stylized as P!nk) is an American singer and songwriter.

{{H2|Controversies and Public Statements}}
In 2019, [[Pink]] reacted to celebrities announcing that they did not perform [[Male genital mutilation|routine infant circumcision]] on their sons, responding by posting a half-naked photograph of her toddler son on Instagram with the circumcision wound visible. Amid backlash after the story going viral, [[Pink]] claimed that she did not realize her son was half-naked the photograph, deleted the original photo, and referred to her critics as "f**ing disgusting trolls".

In 2023, she faced backlash after ejecting a concertgoer who was protesting male circumcision during a performance in San Antonio at the Alamodome in September 25th, 2023, in a clear response to the 2019 viral occurrence. During the incident, which occurred mid-show, [[Pink]] called the concertgoer "that cancer", and later defended her actions, claiming that the protest was "disruptive" and "not appropriate" for the event.

In another notable instance, [[Pink]] expressed strong opposition to the overturning of *Roe v. Wade* in 2022. She publicly urged fans who opposed the decision to "NEVER f***ing listen to my music again,". This statement, which appeared on her social media accounts, drew both support and criticism from her audience.

[[Pink]] made several Instagram posts mocking Charlie Kirk's funeral and accusing Kirk of being a white supremacist. Amid backlash, she had deleted the posts.

{{H2|References}}
- [[usatoday.com]]: [[[Pink]] faces backlash over posting photo of circumcised son without diaper](https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/allthemoms/2019/04/01/[[pink]]-slams-trolls-after-posting-photo-son-without-diaper/3331926002/)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] kicks out concertgoer protesting circumcision mid-show](https://people.com/[[Pink]]-kicks-out-concertgoer-protesting-circumcision-mid-show-7974853)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] tells fans who oppose Roe v. Wade to "never listen to my music"](https://people.com/music/[[Pink]]-tells-fans-who-oppose-roe-v-wade-to-never-listen-to-my-music/)
- [[youtube.com]]: [[[Pink]] deletes Instagram posts mocking Charlie Kirk's death] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7dGCF3sR2s)

{{Bio}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart

2026-10-08T02:10:11Z

V for Vernon:

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart, professionally known as [[Pink]] (often spelled/stylized as P!nk) is an American singer and songwriter.

{{H2|Controversies and Public Statements}}
In 2019, [[Pink]] reacted to celebrities announcing that they did not perform [[Male genital mutilation|routine infant circumcision]] on their sons, responding by posting a half-naked photograph of her toddler son on Instagram with the circumcision wound visible. Amid backlash after the story going viral, [[Pink]] claimed that she did not realize her son was half-naked the photograph, deleted the original photo, and referred to her critics as "f**ing disgusting trolls".

In 2023, she faced backlash after ejecting a concertgoer who was protesting male circumcision during a performance in San Antonio at the Alamodome in September 25th, 2023, in a clear response to the 2019 viral occurrence. During the incident, which occurred mid-show, [[Pink]] called the concertgoer "that cancer", and later defended her actions, claiming that the protest was "disruptive" and "not appropriate" for the event.

In another notable instance, [[Pink]] expressed strong opposition to the overturning of *Roe v. Wade* in 2022. She publicly urged fans who opposed the decision to "NEVER f***ing listen to my music again,". This statement, which appeared on her social media accounts, drew both support and criticism from her audience.

[[Pink]] made several Instagram posts mocking Charlie Kirk's funeral and accusing Kirk of being a white supremacist. Amid backlash, she had deleted the posts.

{{H2|References}}
- [[usatoday.com]]: [[[Pink]] faces backlash over posting photo of circumcised son without diaper]](https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/allthemoms/2019/04/01/[[pink]]-slams-trolls-after-posting-photo-son-without-diaper/3331926002/)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] kicks out concertgoer protesting circumcision mid-show]](https://people.com/[[Pink]]-kicks-out-concertgoer-protesting-circumcision-mid-show-7974853)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] tells fans who oppose Roe v. Wade to "never listen to my music"]](https://people.com/music/[[Pink]]-tells-fans-who-oppose-roe-v-wade-to-never-listen-to-my-music/)
- [[youtube.com]]: [[[Pink]] deletes Instagram posts mocking Charlie Kirk's death]] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7dGCF3sR2s)

{{Bio}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart

2026-10-08T02:01:06Z

V for Vernon:

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart, professionally known as [[Pink]] (often spelled/stylized as P!nk) is an American singer and songwriter.

{{H2|Controversies and Public Statements}}
In 2019, [[Pink]] reacted to celebrities announcing that they did not perform [[Male genital mutilation|routine infant circumcision]] on their sons, responding by posting a half-naked photograph of her toddler son on Instagram with the circumcision wound visible. Amid backlash after the story going viral, [[Pink]] claimed that she did not realize her son was half-naked the photograph, deleted the original photo, and referred to her critics as "f**ing disgusting trolls".

In 2023, she faced backlash after ejecting a concertgoer who was protesting male circumcision during a performance in San Antonio at the Alamodome in September 25th, 2023, in a clear response to the 2019 viral occurrence. During the incident, which occurred mid-show, [[Pink]] called the concertgoer "that cancer", and later defended her actions, claiming that the protest was "disruptive" and "not appropriate" for the event.

In another notable instance, [[Pink]] expressed strong opposition to the overturning of *Roe v. Wade* in 2022. She publicly urged fans who opposed the decision to "NEVER f***ing listen to my music again,". This statement, which appeared on her social media accounts, drew both support and criticism from her audience.

[[Pink]] made several Instagram posts mocking Charlie Kirk's funeral and accusing Kirk of being a white supremacist. Amid backlash, she had deleted the posts.

{{H2|References}}
- [[usatoday.com]]: [[[Pink]] faces backlash over posting photo of circumcised son without diaper](https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/allthemoms/2019/04/01/[[pink]]-slams-trolls-after-posting-photo-son-without-diaper/3331926002/)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] kicks out concertgoer protesting circumcision mid-show](https://people.com/[[Pink]]-kicks-out-concertgoer-protesting-circumcision-mid-show-7974853)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] tells fans who oppose Roe v. Wade to "never listen to my music"]](https://people.com/music/[[Pink]]-tells-fans-who-oppose-roe-v-wade-to-never-listen-to-my-music/)
- [[youtube.com]]: [[Pink]] deletes Instagram posts mocking Charlie Kirk's death (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7dGCF3sR2s)

{{Bio}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart

2026-10-08T01:53:20Z

V for Vernon:

Alecia Beth Moore-Hart, professionally known as [[Pink]] (often spelled/stylized as P!nk) is an American singer and songwriter.

{{H2|Controversies and Public Statements}}
In 2019, [[Pink]] reacted to celebrities announcing that they did not perform [[Male genital mutilation|routine infant circumcision]] on their sons, responding by posting a half-naked photograph of her toddler son on Instagram with the circumcision wound visible. Amid backlash after the story going viral, [[Pink]] claimed that she did not realize her son was half-naked the photograph, deleted the original photo, and referred to her critics as "f**ing disgusting trolls".

In 2023, she faced backlash after ejecting a concertgoer who was protesting male circumcision during a performance in San Antonio at the Alamodome in September 25th, 2023, in a clear response to the 2019 viral occurrence. During the incident, which occurred mid-show, [[Pink]] called the concertgoer "that cancer", and later defended her actions, claiming that the protest was "disruptive" and "not appropriate" for the event.

In another notable instance, [[Pink]] expressed strong opposition to the overturning of *Roe v. Wade* in 2022. She publicly urged fans who opposed the decision to "NEVER f***ing listen to my music again,". This statement, which appeared on her social media accounts, drew both support and criticism from her audience.

{{H2|References}}
- [[usatoday.com]]: [[[Pink]] faces backlash over posting photo of circumcised son without diaper](https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/allthemoms/2019/04/01/[[pink]]-slams-trolls-after-posting-photo-son-without-diaper/3331926002/)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] kicks out concertgoer protesting circumcision mid-show](https://people.com/[[Pink]]-kicks-out-concertgoer-protesting-circumcision-mid-show-7974853)
- [[People.com]]: [[[Pink]] tells fans who oppose Roe v. Wade to "never listen to my music"]](https://people.com/music/[[Pink]]-tells-fans-who-oppose-roe-v-wade-to-never-listen-to-my-music/)

{{Bio}}
{{US}}

{{Ollama}}
{{Pending Human Review}}

Bio-gynocentrism

2022-03-08T03:14:21Z

V for Vernon: /* Objections to Bio-Gynocentrism */

'''Bio-gynocentrism''' refers to a general attitude which regard men and masculinity as expendable and [[male disposability|disposable]] on a biological and evolutionary basis. Bio-gynocentrism also incorporates a corresponding higher value imposed on women, who are the endpoints of the biological disposability of males. Bio-gynocentrism can be best summarized as the alleged scientific basis for sex stratification, with males as the servant sex and females as the serviced. Although the phenomenon and fallacy has existed for decades, the term to describe it was coined by [[Vernon Meigs]] in 2022.

===Description===

Bio-gynocentrists are either serious believers of the fundamental disposability of the human male and are advocates towards that end, or are often those that casually adopt the attitude as if it is common sense.

Common arguments include:
# Men evolved to protect and provide for women because women are of higher [[reproductive value]].
# A tribe can survive if most of the males are wiped out, so long as the women are protected.
# Men are biologically stronger, so they should be expected to die in service to the tribe.

The attitude is commonly adopted by [[Traditional gynocentrist]]s who, despite opposing [[feminism]] for its unjust attitudes towards men, commonly impose similar gynocentric standards of inherent female biological importance and expectations of male sacrifice.

===As Component to the Gynocentric Double Standard===

It can be argued that bio-gynocentrism is a key enabler to the gynocentric double standard. The narrative of the "strong independent woman" that can do anything a man can appears to be reliant on bio-gynocentric standards, in which men supplant (by female demand) their own efforts and life in favor of this idea of woman.

===Objections to Bio-Gynocentrism===

[[Adam Kostakis]] speaks on the subject:

<blockquote>"I do not believe that gynocentrism is a biological predisposition. I do not believe that evolution grants women superior biological value and status. I do not believe men are created to “serve” women, or that this situation is inescapable. What the advocates of male disposability describe is not a symbiotic relationship, but a parasitic one. And it is one I believe is socially constructed. It’s an enduring relationship, for sure! But you know what they say, rules are made to be broken."<ref>[https://gynocentrism.com/2021/08/02/adam-kostakis-is-gynocentrism-a-biological-essential-2011/ Adam Kostakis - Is gynocentrism a biological essential? 2011]</ref></blockquote>

[[Robert Brockway]] argues that with a population approaching eight billion, humans are no longer struggling to survive and no longer need the capacity to reproduce quickly. Whatever the reasons that human historically prioritised the survival of women, they should no longer apply.

[[Vernon Meigs]] (coiner of the term) suggests the following eight attributes as traits of the hypothetical bio-gynocentrist:

1. Lack of imagination (inability to conceive of a masculinity aside from the chivalric narrative)

2. Similarity to the average feminist (having male disposal as a means to a gynocentric endpoint)

3. Preoccupation with male "hard-wiring" (in the name of evolution, the narrative of male helplessness and base instinct over volition and free will)

4. Skewed, biased conclusions regarding human biology (in which women are considered the far valuable in comparison to the disposable male)

5. Refusal to hold women accountable (in favor of subjective interpretations of traditional gender roles in which women hold no agency, resulting in men taking on more responsibility and consequences than warranted)

6. Blatant collectivism regarding the purpose of the male sex

7. Closeted need and preoccupation of being on one's knees (as white knights and too many males do)

8. The accusation of science denial, lobbed against those who disagree that biology deems men as the inferior sex below women.

[[Peter Ryan]] speaks extensively on the "fallacy of the golden uterus". <ref>[https://gynocentrism.com/2019/04/29/gynocentrism-and-the-golden-uterus-part-one/ Gynocentrism and the golden uterus, part one, 2019]</ref><ref>[https://gynocentrism.com/2019/05/02/gynocentrism-and-the-golden-uterus-part-two/ Gynocentrism and the golden uterus, part two, 2019]</ref>

==References==

[[Category: Featured Articles]]
[[Category: Glossary]]

Bio-gynocentrism

2022-03-08T03:13:26Z

V for Vernon: /* Objections to Bio-Gynocentrism */

'''Bio-gynocentrism''' refers to a general attitude which regard men and masculinity as expendable and [[male disposability|disposable]] on a biological and evolutionary basis. Bio-gynocentrism also incorporates a corresponding higher value imposed on women, who are the endpoints of the biological disposability of males. Bio-gynocentrism can be best summarized as the alleged scientific basis for sex stratification, with males as the servant sex and females as the serviced. Although the phenomenon and fallacy has existed for decades, the term to describe it was coined by [[Vernon Meigs]] in 2022.

===Description===

Bio-gynocentrists are either serious believers of the fundamental disposability of the human male and are advocates towards that end, or are often those that casually adopt the attitude as if it is common sense.

Common arguments include:
# Men evolved to protect and provide for women because women are of higher [[reproductive value]].
# A tribe can survive if most of the males are wiped out, so long as the women are protected.
# Men are biologically stronger, so they should be expected to die in service to the tribe.

The attitude is commonly adopted by [[Traditional gynocentrist]]s who, despite opposing [[feminism]] for its unjust attitudes towards men, commonly impose similar gynocentric standards of inherent female biological importance and expectations of male sacrifice.

===As Component to the Gynocentric Double Standard===

It can be argued that bio-gynocentrism is a key enabler to the gynocentric double standard. The narrative of the "strong independent woman" that can do anything a man can appears to be reliant on bio-gynocentric standards, in which men supplant (by female demand) their own efforts and life in favor of this idea of woman.

===Objections to Bio-Gynocentrism===

[[Adam Kostakis]] speaks on the subject:

<blockquote>"I do not believe that gynocentrism is a biological predisposition. I do not believe that evolution grants women superior biological value and status. I do not believe men are created to “serve” women, or that this situation is inescapable. What the advocates of male disposability describe is not a symbiotic relationship, but a parasitic one. And it is one I believe is socially constructed. It’s an enduring relationship, for sure! But you know what they say, rules are made to be broken."<ref>[https://gynocentrism.com/2021/08/02/adam-kostakis-is-gynocentrism-a-biological-essential-2011/ Adam Kostakis - Is gynocentrism a biological essential? 2011]</ref></blockquote>

[[Robert Brockway]] argues that with a population approaching eight billion, humans are no longer struggling to survive and no longer need the capacity to reproduce quickly. Whatever the reasons that human historically prioritised the survival of women, they should no longer apply.

[[Vernon Meigs]] attributes the following as traits of the hypothetical bio-gynocentrist:

1. Lack of imagination (inability to conceive of a masculinity aside from the chivalric narrative)

2. Similarity to the average feminist (having male disposal as a means to a gynocentric endpoint)

3. Preoccupation with male "hard-wiring" (in the name of evolution, the narrative of male helplessness and base instinct over volition and free will)

4. Skewed, biased conclusions regarding human biology (in which women are considered the far valuable in comparison to the disposable male)

5. Refusal to hold women accountable (in favor of subjective interpretations of traditional gender roles in which women hold no agency, resulting in men taking on more responsibility and consequences than warranted)

6. Blatant collectivism regarding the purpose of the male sex

7. Closeted need and preoccupation of being on one's knees (as white knights and too many males do)

8. The accusation of science denial, lobbed against those who disagree that biology deems men as the inferior sex below women.

[[Peter Ryan]] speaks extensively on the "fallacy of the golden uterus". <ref>[https://gynocentrism.com/2019/04/29/gynocentrism-and-the-golden-uterus-part-one/ Gynocentrism and the golden uterus, part one, 2019]</ref><ref>[https://gynocentrism.com/2019/05/02/gynocentrism-and-the-golden-uterus-part-two/ Gynocentrism and the golden uterus, part two, 2019]</ref>

==References==

[[Category: Featured Articles]]
[[Category: Glossary]]

Bio-gynocentrism

2022-03-08T03:08:54Z

V for Vernon: /* Objections to Bio-Gynocentrism */

'''Bio-gynocentrism''' refers to a general attitude which regard men and masculinity as expendable and [[male disposability|disposable]] on a biological and evolutionary basis. Bio-gynocentrism also incorporates a corresponding higher value imposed on women, who are the endpoints of the biological disposability of males. Bio-gynocentrism can be best summarized as the alleged scientific basis for sex stratification, with males as the servant sex and females as the serviced. Although the phenomenon and fallacy has existed for decades, the term to describe it was coined by [[Vernon Meigs]] in 2022.

===Description===

Bio-gynocentrists are either serious believers of the fundamental disposability of the human male and are advocates towards that end, or are often those that casually adopt the attitude as if it is common sense.

Common arguments include:
# Men evolved to protect and provide for women because women are of higher [[reproductive value]].
# A tribe can survive if most of the males are wiped out, so long as the women are protected.
# Men are biologically stronger, so they should be expected to die in service to the tribe.

The attitude is commonly adopted by [[Traditional gynocentrist]]s who, despite opposing [[feminism]] for its unjust attitudes towards men, commonly impose similar gynocentric standards of inherent female biological importance and expectations of male sacrifice.

===As Component to the Gynocentric Double Standard===

It can be argued that bio-gynocentrism is a key enabler to the gynocentric double standard. The narrative of the "strong independent woman" that can do anything a man can appears to be reliant on bio-gynocentric standards, in which men supplant (by female demand) their own efforts and life in favor of this idea of woman.

===Objections to Bio-Gynocentrism===

[[Adam Kostakis]] speaks on the subject:

<blockquote>"I do not believe that gynocentrism is a biological predisposition. I do not believe that evolution grants women superior biological value and status. I do not believe men are created to “serve” women, or that this situation is inescapable. What the advocates of male disposability describe is not a symbiotic relationship, but a parasitic one. And it is one I believe is socially constructed. It’s an enduring relationship, for sure! But you know what they say, rules are made to be broken."<ref>[https://gynocentrism.com/2021/08/02/adam-kostakis-is-gynocentrism-a-biological-essential-2011/ Adam Kostakis - Is gynocentrism a biological essential? 2011]</ref></blockquote>

[[Robert Brockway]] argues that with a population approaching eight billion, humans are no longer struggling to survive and no longer need the capacity to reproduce quickly. Whatever the reasons that human historically prioritised the survival of women, they should no longer apply.

[[Vernon Meigs]] attributes the following as traits of the hypothetical bio-gynocentrist:

1. Lack of imagination (inability to conceive of a masculinity aside from the chivalric narrative)

2. Similarity to the average feminist (having male disposal as a means to a gynocentric endpoint)

3. Preoccupation with male "hard-wiring" (in the name of evolution, the narrative of male helplessness and base instinct over volition and free will)

4. Skewed, biased conclusions regarding human biology (in which women are considered the far valuable in comparison to the disposable male)

5. Refusal to hold women accountable (in favor of subjective interpretations of traditional gender roles in which women hold no agency, resulting in men taking on more responsibility and consequences than warranted)

6. Blatant collectivism regarding the purpose of the male sex

7. Closeted need and preoccupation of being on one's knees (as white knights and too many males do)

8. The accusation of science denial, lobbed against those who disagree that biology deems men as the inferior sex below women.

==References==

[[Category: Featured Articles]]
[[Category: Glossary]]

Bio-gynocentrism

2022-03-08T03:06:07Z

V for Vernon: /* Objections to Bio-Gynocentrism */

'''Bio-gynocentrism''' refers to a general attitude which regard men and masculinity as expendable and [[male disposability|disposable]] on a biological and evolutionary basis. Bio-gynocentrism also incorporates a corresponding higher value imposed on women, who are the endpoints of the biological disposability of males. Bio-gynocentrism can be best summarized as the alleged scientific basis for sex stratification, with males as the servant sex and females as the serviced. Although the phenomenon and fallacy has existed for decades, the term to describe it was coined by [[Vernon Meigs]] in 2022.

===Description===

Bio-gynocentrists are either serious believers of the fundamental disposability of the human male and are advocates towards that end, or are often those that casually adopt the attitude as if it is common sense.

Common arguments include:
# Men evolved to protect and provide for women because women are of higher [[reproductive value]].
# A tribe can survive if most of the males are wiped out, so long as the women are protected.
# Men are biologically stronger, so they should be expected to die in service to the tribe.

The attitude is commonly adopted by [[Traditional gynocentrist]]s who, despite opposing [[feminism]] for its unjust attitudes towards men, commonly impose similar gynocentric standards of inherent female biological importance and expectations of male sacrifice.

===As Component to the Gynocentric Double Standard===

It can be argued that bio-gynocentrism is a key enabler to the gynocentric double standard. The narrative of the "strong independent woman" that can do anything a man can appears to be reliant on bio-gynocentric standards, in which men supplant (by female demand) their own efforts and life in favor of this idea of woman.

===Objections to Bio-Gynocentrism===

[[Adam Kostakis]] speaks on the subject:

<blockquote>"I do not believe that gynocentrism is a biological predisposition. I do not believe that evolution grants women superior biological value and status. I do not believe men are created to “serve” women, or that this situation is inescapable. What the advocates of male disposability describe is not a symbiotic relationship, but a parasitic one. And it is one I believe is socially constructed. It’s an enduring relationship, for sure! But you know what they say, rules are made to be broken."<ref>[https://gynocentrism.com/2021/08/02/adam-kostakis-is-gynocentrism-a-biological-essential-2011/ Adam Kostakis - Is gynocentrism a biological essential? 2011]</ref></blockquote>

[[Robert Brockway]] argues that with a population approaching eight billion, humans are no longer struggling to survive and no longer need the capacity to reproduce quickly. Whatever the reasons that human historically prioritised the survival of women, they should no longer apply.

[[Vernon Meigs]] attributes the following as traits of the hypothetical bio-gynocentrist:

1. Lack of imagination (inability to conceive of a masculinity aside from the chivalric narrative)

2. Similarity to the average feminist (having male disposal as a means to a gynocentric endpoint)

3. Preoccupation with male "hard-wiring" (in the name of evolution, the narrative of male helplessness and base instinct over volition and free will)

4. Skewed, biased conclusions regarding human biology (in which women are considered the far valuable in comparison to the disposable male)

5. Refusal to hold women accountable (in favor of subjective interpretations of traditional gender roles in which women hold no agency, resulting in men taking on more responsibility and consequences than warranted)

6. Blatant collectivism regarding the purpose of the male sex

7. Closeted need and preoccupation of being on one's knees (as white knights and the too many males do)

8. The accusation of science denial, lobbed against those who disagree that biology deems men as the inferior sex below women.

==References==

[[Category: Featured Articles]]
[[Category: Glossary]]

Bio-gynocentrism

2022-03-08T02:57:10Z

V for Vernon:

Bio-gynocentrism

2022-03-08T02:55:48Z

V for Vernon:

Bio-gynocentrism

2022-03-08T02:54:14Z

V for Vernon:

Bio-gynocentrism

2022-03-07T15:48:37Z

V for Vernon: Created page with "'''Bio-gynocentrism''' refers to a general attitude which regard men and masculinity as expendable and disposable on a biological and evolutionary basis. Bio-gynocentrism also..."

'''Bio-gynocentrism''' refers to a general attitude which regard men and masculinity as expendable and disposable on a biological and evolutionary basis. Bio-gynocentrism also incorporates a corresponding higher value imposed on women, who are the endpoints of the biological disposability of males. Bio-gynocentrism can be best summarized as the alleged scientific basis for sex stratification, with males as the servant sex and females as the serviced.

===Description===

Bio-gynocentrists are either serious believers of the fundamental disposability of the human male and are advocates towards that end, or are often those that casually adopt the attitude as if it is common sense.

Common arguments include:
1. Men evolved to protect and provide for women because women are of higher reproductive value.
2. A tribe can survive if most of the males are wiped out, so long as the women are protected.
3. Men are biologically stronger, so they should be expected to die in service to the tribe.

The attitude is commonly adopted by [[Traditional gynocentrist]]s who, despite opposing [[feminism]] for its unjust attitudes towards men, commonly impose similar gynocentric standards of inherent female biological importance and expectations of male sacrifice.

===Objections to Bio-Gynocentrism===

Adam Kostakis speaks on the subject:

<blockquote>"I do not believe that gynocentrism is a biological predisposition. I do not believe that evolution grants women superior biological value and status. I do not believe men are created to “serve” women, or that this situation is inescapable. What the advocates of male disposability describe is not a symbiotic relationship, but a parasitic one. And it is one I believe is socially constructed. It’s an enduring relationship, for sure! But you know what they say, rules are made to be broken."<ref>[https://gynocentrism.com/2021/08/02/adam-kostakis-is-gynocentrism-a-biological-essential-2011/ Adam Kostakis - Is gynocentrism a biological essential? 2011]</ref></blockquote>

==References==

[[Category:Glossary]]